That seems to be a very hard question to me. I hope that they, the judge and the jury, try to give the best possible justice but of course, that's not obvious to be sure of the sentence each time. Moreover, procedures are very "heavy" and some lawyers are very good at showing that the prosecustion barrister breaks some rules sometimes.... That's why there are probably innocent people in jail and guilty people outside...
That seems to be a very hard question to me. I hope that they, the judge and the jury, try to give the best possible justice, but of course, that's not obviously the judgment each time. Moreover, procedures are very complex, and some lawyers are very good at showing that the prosecution barrister break some rules sometimes.... That's why there are probably innocent people in jail and guilty people outside...
That seems to be a very hard question to me. I hope that they, the judge and the jury, try to give their best (or 'try to deliver justice' or 'try to make the trial fair') possible justice but of course, it's not always possible to get the correct judgement each time. Moreover, the correct procedures can be hard to follow and some lawyers ('barristers' in England) are sometimes very good at showing that the prosecustion barrister has broken a rule .... That's why there are probably innocent people in jail and guilty people outside...
Do you think that the legal system always gives justice correctly?