News Article

Share your opinions about this article with the busuu.com community!



Chief executive of National Rifle Association and husband of shot congresswoman set out arguments in TV debate
Advocates on both sides of the US gun control debate gave no indication of giving ground in interviews on Sunday, even on the least contentious question of background checks.
Wayne LaPierre, the chief executive of the National Rifle Association, told Fox News on Sunday that universal background checks did not work because criminals do not comply with them.
"It's a fraud to call it universal," LaPierre said. He did not trust the Obama administration and he believed the president's proposals on background checks would turn into a "universal registry on law-abiding people" that would create a "bureaucratic nightmare", he said. "ObamaCare wasn't a tax until they needed it to be a tax. I don't think you can trust these people."
Earlier in the show, Mark Kelly, the retired navy captain, whose wife, the former Arizona congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, was shot in the head by a gunman, argued for background checks. He repeated to Fox News what he told a fractious Senate debate into the issue last week: that Giffords and others hurt in the shooting in Tucson in 2010 might have avoided their fate if the state had entered the name of the shooter into a database.
Kelly, who appeared along with LaPierre at the Senate hearing on Wednesday, said of the NRA chief: "He's going to say that background checks don't work. But that is not true."
He urged LaPierre to "listen to his members", as 74% of NRA members support background checks. Kelly said: "Since 1999, 1.7 million people were prevented from getting a firearm because they had a criminal record or a history of mental illness. We stopped those people from getting a gun. Now we have to make sure they don't have a second option to get the gun – that is, getting it from a private seller or the gun-show loophole without getting a background check."
His comments came seven weeks after the mass killing of 20 children and six adults at a Connecticut elementary school in Newtown, an event that has reignited public debate on the issue.
Kelly also said he was in favour of the ban on high-capacity magazines proposed by President Obama and fellow Democrats in the Senate.
The NRA's position on background checks is more conservative than it was 14 years ago, when LaPierre told a congressional panel: "We think it's reasonable to provide mandatory instant criminal background checks for every sale at every gun show. No loopholes anywhere for anyone."
The interview with LaPierre grew particularly heated when Wallace asked whether he regretted the NRA's controversial advert featuring President Obama's two daughters. It wasn't about them, LaPierre said. "The president's kids are safe, and we're all thankful for it."
Wallace said that all schoolchildren don't face the same threats as the president's children. "Tell that to the people in Newtown," said LaPierre, whose response to the Newtown shooting was a call for armed guards in schools. "Unfortunately, I think there are parents all over the country that think their kids are entitled to the same amount of protection when they go to school."
"You really think that the president's children are the same kind of target as every school child in America?" Wallace said. "That's ridiculous and you know it, sir."
When Chris Wallace cited supreme court justice Antonin Scalia's opinion, in the Heller decision that struck down some parts of strict gun control laws in the District of Columbia in 2008, that the Second Amendment is not unlimited, LaPierre said that the most basic right was to "protect yourself and the American public wants to be able".
He said: "If you limit the American public's access to semi-automatic technology, you limit their ability to survive. If someone's invading your house, I mean you shouldn't say you only have five or six shots. You ought to have what you need to protect yourself, not what some politician thinks is reasonable."
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2013
PRICARTE

PRICARTE (59)

PRICARTE
I speak:
Spanish
I learn:
English, German
Busuu berries :
26113
  

There is a problem in America related to the contentious guns control. For this reason, there was, recently, a TV program where Wayne LaPierre of NRA's and Mark Kelly representative against NRA's had a debate about this issue.
The debate was very hot because both representatives expounded their ideas with strong examples.
On one hand NRA's said that every person needs to protect himself to survive, owning guns. So, people avoid being shot. For example, if someone is invading their houses.
Kelly, according his ideas, said that background checks didn't work.
On the other hand, the husband of the sadly famous shot congresswoman was strongly in favor of guns control. He was in favor of checking arms by armed guards, for example in schools.
All children ought are so safe than the president's kids, said LaPierre... LaPierre didn't think that if was a strong control all people would be safer...
I can't avoid give my opinion about this issue: I consider that a society where every person has a gun, because it's very easy to buy it, isn't a "health society". Guns yes. but only for police and bodyguard with arms permission. In my opinion the real problem is that arms are a successful business...

LambertoGaona

LambertoGaona (41)

LambertoGaona
I speak:
English
I learn:
Portuguese (Brazil)
Busuu berries :
15057
  

There is a problem in America related to the contentious guns control. For this reason, there was, recently, a TV program where Wayne LaPierre of NRA's and Mark Kelly representative against NRA's had a debate about this issue.
The debate was very hot because both representatives expoused their ideas with strong examples.
On one hand NRA's said that every person needs to protect himself to survive, owning guns. So, people avoid being shot. For example, if someone is invading their houses.
Kelly, according his ideas, said that background checks didn't work.
On the other hand, the husband of the sadly famous shot congresswoman was strongly in favor of guns control. He was in favor of checking arms by armed guards, for example in schools.
All children are so safe than the president's kids, said LaPierre... LaPierre didn't think that if was a strong control all people would be safer...
I can't avoid give my opinion about this issue: I consider that, a society where every person has a gun, because it's very easy to buy it, isn't a "health society". Guns yes. but only for police and bodyguard with arms permission. In my opinion the real problem is that arms are a successful business...

PRICARTE

PRICARTE (59)

PRICARTE
I speak:
Spanish
I learn:
English, German
Busuu berries :
26113
  

Only a mistake?...

Alan Agnew

Alan Agnew (57)

Alan Agnew
I speak:
English
I learn:
Spanish, German, French, Portuguese (Brazil)
Busuu berries :
25148
  

There is a problem in America related to the contentious guns control. For this reason, there was, recently, a TV programme computer program !] where Wayne LaPierre of the NRA's and Mark Kelly representative against the NRA's had a debate about this issue.The debate was very hot ['heated' is the word usually used here] because both representatives expounded their ideas with strong examples. On one hand the NRA's [es una organización] said that every person needs to protect himself to survive, by owning guns. so, people avoid being shot, for example, if someone is invading their houses. Kelly, according to his ideas, said that background checks didn't work.On the other hand, the husband of the sadly famous shot congresswoman was strongly in favour of guns control [o 'control of guns']. He was in favour of the checking arms by armed guards, for example in schools. All children ought are so to be safer than the president's kids, said LaPierre... LaPierre didn't think that if there were [usamos el subjunctivo pasado acquí]  was a strong control all people would be safer...I can't avoid giving my opinion about this issue: I consider that a society where every person has a gun, because it's very easy to buy it, isn't a "healthy society". Guns yes. but only for police and bodyguards with arms permission. In my opinion the real problem is that arms are a successful business...   Great work  well done --it deserves a more detailed correction.

PRICARTE

PRICARTE (59)

PRICARTE
I speak:
Spanish
I learn:
English, German
Busuu berries :
26113
  

Muchísimas gracias por tu corrección Alan. Tengo una duda: ¿Por qué se pone gerundio (giving) en la frase I can't avoid giving...

Saludos desde la isla de Lanzarote

Alan Agnew

Alan Agnew (57)

Alan Agnew
I speak:
English
I learn:
Spanish, German, French, Portuguese (Brazil)
Busuu berries :
25148
  

Lanzarote, qué suerte!     Algunos verbos usan el infinitivo --- I want to give,  otros verbos usan el gerundo --I avoid giving   y otros usan ambos  --I prefer to give ,o I prefer giving.  Lo siento  hay que aprenderlos.

Un clase de verbos usa el infinitivo sin 'to' -- I will give etc y would, should, could, can,may, might,do, does, shall,must   y sus formas negativos,  I won't give etc       Saludos desde Cornualles.

 

PRICARTE

PRICARTE (59)

PRICARTE
I speak:
Spanish
I learn:
English, German
Busuu berries :
26113
  

muchísimas gracias Ahora lo entiendo Voy a buscar por internet esos verbos que rigen gerundio. Cuenta con mi ayuda para cualquier duda de español. Estaré encantada de ayudarte. Estoy segura de que eres tan buen médico como corrector. Felicidad para tu familia y para tí

Alan Agnew

Alan Agnew (57)

Alan Agnew
I speak:
English
I learn:
Spanish, German, French, Portuguese (Brazil)
Busuu berries :
25148
  

Thanks Pilar  that is very kind of you.  I really enjoy learning Spanish and helping others with English, we can help each other.   Best wishes to you and your family too.  You have nice photos on busuu.  Hasta luego  Alan